The 2026 Multifamily Staff Safety Data | Apartment Guardian
The 2026 Multifamily Wellbeing Report

What 400 multifamily professionals told us about safety, retention, and the gap between women and men.

An independent third-party survey of onsite property management professionals — leasing agents, maintenance technicians, community managers, and executives — about how safety shapes their work, their decisions, and their decision to stay.

400 respondents  ·  Blind methodology  ·  Fielded 2026  ·  Independent third-party research
400Respondents
60%Female
BlindMethodology
2026Fielded
The findings

Six numbers worth knowing.

If you operate, lead, or work onsite at a multifamily property, these data points represent something worth thinking about — even if the conclusions you draw are different from ours.

52%

Safety significantly influences retention decisions.

More than half of multifamily staff told us that feeling safe at work significantly influences whether they stay in their role. Not "somewhat." Not "is a factor." Significantly influences.

1 in 5

Women have left — or considered leaving — over safety.

22.2% of women in multifamily property management have either left a role or considered leaving because they didn't feel safe at work. In an industry already losing 30%+ of staff annually, this is one of the most actionable retention insights we've seen.

94%

Of female leasing agents want a dedicated safety device.

94% of female leasing agents — and 91.8% of all leasing consultants — said a personal safety device that connects directly to 911 would improve their comfort at work. Across the highest-risk customer-facing role in our industry, the answer is nearly unanimous.

+20 pts

Retention lift for staff who have a panic button.

Staff at properties that provide a personal panic button are 20 percentage points more likely to still be in their role 12 months from now — compared to staff at properties with no safety tools at all. That's a swing operators normally only see from major comp adjustments.

14 pts

Gender gap in confidence working alone.

When asked how confident they feel performing tasks alone — showing units, walking the property, opening or closing — women rate themselves 14 percentage points lower than men in the same roles. Same property. Same task. Different lived experience.

46%

Of affordable housing staff reported an incident in 12 months.

Nearly half of staff working at affordable housing properties told us they experienced a workplace safety incident in the past 12 months. The number for single-family rentals was 27%, and for conventional multifamily 35% — pointing at a real and uneven distribution of risk.

The 14-point gender gap

Women and men do the same job — and feel very differently about doing it.

Asked how confident they feel performing tasks alone — showing units, walking the property, working at the leasing office, opening or closing — multifamily staff gave answers that split sharply by gender.

57.7% of women rate themselves "very" or "completely" confident. 72.0% of men in the same roles, at the same kinds of properties, rate themselves the same. That's a 14-point gap in lived experience between people who hold the same jobs.

It's the kind of finding that's been hiding in industry retention data for years. Women aren't avoiding multifamily because of pay or career path — many love the work. They're navigating around tasks they don't feel safe doing, factoring safety into their stay-or-leave decisions, and quietly leaving when they've had enough.

Men — confident working alone
72%
Women — confident working alone
58%
14 percentage point gap
Between how confident men and women feel doing the same job.
The vulnerability map

The specific tasks that make multifamily staff feel unsafe.

We asked respondents to identify which job duties make them feel most vulnerable or at risk. The patterns by gender are sharper than industry conventional wisdom typically reflects.

Handling a difficult resident situation in person
Women
48.5%
Men
44.7%
Walking the property alone (parking lots, common areas)
Women
37.2%
Men
23.6%
+13.6 pt gender gap
Working late hours or opening/closing alone
Women
36.8%
Men
34.8%
Showing vacant apartments to prospective residents
Women
33.5%
Men
24.8%
+8.7 pt gender gap
Working at the leasing office alone
Women
18.0%
Men
14.9%
Performing move-in / move-out inspections
Women
17.2%
Men
18.0%
What employers actually provide

The current state of multifamily safety infrastructure.

We asked staff which safety tools and resources their employer currently provides. Respondents could select all that apply.

Safety training (working alone / handling threatening situations)
37.5%
Company-provided mobile phone for emergencies
33.2%
Dedicated security guard or monitored security system
31.0%
Buddy system or check-in protocol when working alone
30.0%
None of the above (no safety tools at all)
28.5%
Personal panic button or emergency alert device
18.5%

Two numbers worth sitting with: 28.5% of multifamily staff have no safety tools at all at work, and only 18.5% have a dedicated panic button. The most common provision is safety training — useful, but training doesn't help in the moment an incident is happening.

A reframe worth considering

Safety isn't a soft retention lever. It's one of the most measurable ones we've found.

The multifamily industry spends enormous resources on retention. Recruiting bonuses. Training programs. Recognition platforms. Engagement surveys. Quarterly bonuses. All worthwhile. All necessary.

But the data here suggests something underneath all of that: a foundational layer that determines whether any of the work above sticks. If a meaningful percentage of your staff is making career decisions based on whether they feel safe at work, no recognition program will retain them. No quarterly bonus will reverse the decision. No engagement survey will surface the real reason — because they won't tell HR. They'll just leave.

"Staff equipped with a panic alert device are 20 percentage points more likely to still be in their role after 12 months — compared to staff at properties with no safety tools at all."

That's the kind of swing operators normally only see from major comp adjustments or restructured incentive programs. Worth thinking about.

Where to go from here

Three ways to dig deeper.

Pick whichever feels useful. None of them require a sales call.

Get the full 30-page report

The complete data set, methodology, segmented breakdowns by role, gender, and property type, plus the chapters we couldn't fit on this page.

Download report →

Subscribe to the Crime Digest

Monthly briefing on multifamily crime trends, regulatory updates, and operational safety practices. Free, no spam, one click to unsubscribe.

Subscribe →

Talk to our team about your portfolio

A 15-minute walkthrough with our team to talk through what these findings mean for your specific operation. No pitch — just a conversation.

Schedule a walkthrough →
Want the full report?

Get the 2026 Multifamily Staff Wellbeing Report

30 pages of independent third-party research. The data on this page is a fraction of what's in the report. Free, no follow-up call required.

We'll email you the PDF immediately. You'll also be added to our quarterly research updates — unsubscribe anytime in one click.